The submission appears to be a low-effort or spam entry using a typosquatting domain ('couldraker.com' vs the legitimate agency 'cloudraker.com'). The claim 'most people have used my product' is factually incorrect and unsupported. With no project description, empty technical details, and clear red flags regarding authenticity, the project receives a negative score indicating a lack of verifiable utility or legitimacy.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline