The submission contains demonstrably false and hyperbolic claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product' for a B2B tool). Critical fields are misused (listing 'marketcap' under revenue) or generic ('Software Development'). While the concept of multi-cloud management is valid, the lack of verifiable evidence, the vague description, and the poor quality of the response result in a score reflecting minimal to no proven usefulness based on the provided data.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline