The submission represents a real, early-stage HRTech startup ('Climate Benefits') identified via external verification, but the input data is of extremely low quality. The submitter uses a pseudonym ('ShadowFang'), provides demonstrably false traction claims ('most people have used my product'), and inaccurate audience data ('everyone'). While the underlying concept of climate benefits for employees has market relevance, the submission fails to provide credible evidence of utility, adoption, or innovation, resulting in a heavily penalized score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline