The submission for CJT Consulting lacks verifiable evidence and contains hyperbolic, unrealistic claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product'). The website appears inactive or unindexed, and the 'technologies used' section lists a service industry rather than technology. With no verifiable traction, a suspect team size relative to digital footprint, and poor response quality, the project scores exceptionally low.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline