The project 'Citigroup' represents a massive, established global financial entity with undeniable market traction ($172B market cap) and reach (229k employees). However, the submission itself ('LunarKeeper') is of extremely low quality, providing generic descriptions, zero technical insight, and vague claims ('most people have used my product'). While the entity's sheer scale guarantees a high baseline score, the lack of specific technical evidence and the lazy response quality significantly cap the potential score, preventing it from reaching the top tier reserved for comprehensive, high-tech submissions.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline