The submission describes a niche consulting firm for education but lacks credible evidence of technology or scale. The claims regarding audience reach ('everyone') and traction ('most people have used my product') are demonstrably false and severely damage the credibility of the entry. As a service-based business with no apparent custom technology and low-quality submission data, it scores very low on the PoU scale.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline