CherryOnTech is a legitimate volunteer-run organization with a commendable mission to support underrepresented genders in tech through mentorship cohorts. However, the submission itself is of extremely low quality, containing obviously false claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product'), invalid contact details, and lacking any concrete metrics. While the project has verifiable real-world utility and a small, active community (visible via YouTube and Medium), the PoU score is significantly constrained by its early-stage scale and the submission's failure to provide credible evidence of traction.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline