The submission contains critical inconsistencies that render it unevaluatable. The URL provided belongs to a UK-based pharmaceutical recruitment agency ('Chemistree Solutions Limited'), while the project description describes a student-led environmental club at Delhi Technological University ('ChemisTree'). Additionally, the traction claim that 'most people have used my product' is demonstrably false, and the user alias 'StarFang' suggests a lack of professional intent. The submission appears to be a mismatch of copied data with no verifiable proof of usefulness for either entity.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline