The submission represents 'Cheil New Zealand', a legitimate and established branch of a global marketing agency (Cheil Worldwide). However, the submission quality is extremely low, featuring vague hyperbolic claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product', 'audience: everyone') and confusing financial metrics ('marketcap: 17000000'). While the team size (125) suggests significant real-world operations and traction, the lack of specific evidence, case studies, or clear technological innovation in the submission triggers severe quality penalties. The project is evaluated as a service agency with poor submission hygiene rather than a high-growth technology product.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline