The project represents a legitimate, established B2B software business ('Checkbox') with verifiable revenue ($2M-$6M estimated) and a team of ~40-50 people, aligning with the user's data. However, the submission quality is extremely poor, containing hyperbolic claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product') and sparse details. While the underlying business utility and traction are strong (comparable to or exceeding the calibration reference), the score is significantly penalized by the lack of credible evidence provided in the submission itself and the vagueness regarding the specific entity (Survey tool vs. Workflow Automation platform).
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline