The submission receives a minimal score due to a critical lack of verifiable information and the presence of hyperbolic, unrealistic claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product'). The description is vague, contains typos, and fails to demonstrate any real-world utility, technical depth, or business traction. The project appears to be a low-effort or test submission with no evidence of a viable product or team.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline