Chainrisk addresses a significant problem in the DeFi sector (economic risk management) with a relevant solution. However, the PoU score is heavily penalized due to the low quality of the submission. Claims such as 'everyone' for audience reach and 'most people have used my product' are hyperbolic and verifiably false for a B2B niche tool. While the project appears to have real-world utility and verified existence (chainrisk.cloud), the submission fails to provide credible evidence of traction, leading to a score in the 'Small but promising' range rather than a higher tier.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline