The project 'CERSI-AI' refers to a legitimate UK National Centre of Excellence for Regulatory Science and Innovation (verified via search). However, the submission itself is of extremely low quality and contains disqualifying red flags. The user 'CrimsonFang' provides false traction claims ('most people have used my product'), refers to 'marketcap' for a non-profit regulatory body, and lists a numeric email address. While the underlying entity has high real-world utility, the submission fails to provide verifiable evidence and appears to be a spam or placeholder entry using the name of a real organization. The score reflects the potential of the actual entity severely penalized by the invalid submission data.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline