The submission for 'Cérebrum' presents significant red flags indicating a likely test, spam, or low-effort entry. While the descriptive text outlines a professional consultancy service, the specific data fields contain hyperbolic and verifiable falsehoods (e.g., audience reach claiming 'everyone' and 'most people have used my product', technologies listed simply as 'Internet'). Furthermore, the website 'cerebrum.website' does not appear in search indices, contradicting the claim of a 30-person team and established market presence. The revenue field confuses market cap with revenue. Consequently, the project scores near zero due to a lack of verifiable existence and extremely poor submission quality.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline