The project represents a traditional B2B management consulting service (China expansion) rather than a scalable technology product. The submission contains significant red flags and inaccuracies, including the claim that 'most people' have used the service and an audience definition of 'everyone,' which contradicts the niche nature of the business. The reported financial metric ('all time marketcap: 500000') is ambiguous and, if interpreted as total revenue since 2018, indicates very low economic activity for a reported team of six. The project lacks technical innovation and verifiable traction signals required for a high Proof of Usefulness score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline