The submission lacks credibility due to significant red flags, including demonstrably false claims of traction ('most people have used my product') and an unrealistic target audience ('everyone'). The project description is a generic list of high-tech buzzwords without evidence of specific implementation or proprietary methodology. Revenue figures are ambiguous ('marketcap'), and the team size of 6 contradicts the scale of claims. The project appears to be a small consulting entity with no verifiable proof of usefulness or market impact.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline