The submission represents a legitimate academic entity (Centre for Sustainability Management at Leuphana University) but is comprised of extremely low-quality, hyperbolic, and unverifiable data (e.g., 'most people have used my product', nonsensical market cap). While the institution itself has utility and history, the submission fails to provide credible evidence of traction, innovation, or reach, treating the input fields frivolously. The score reflects the existence of the entity heavily penalized by the 'red flag' quality of the provided metrics.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline