The submission contains incoherent data, mixing a fantasy project name ('ThunderStone') with a description of the University of Agder's School of Business and Law. Traction claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product' and a nonsensical market cap) are demonstrably false. While the linked URL is a legitimate educational institution, the specific project submission lacks definition, technical detail, or verifiable utility, appearing to be spam or a test entry.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline