The submission references a legitimate and high-value European standardization body (CEN/TC 251), but the entry data is extremely poor and likely spam or a placeholder. Key fields contain nonsensical data (e.g., 'marketcap' for a non-profit committee, generic 'IronWalker' name, audience claim 'everyone'). While the underlying entity has immense real-world utility and reach, the submission fails to provide any verifiable evidence, forcing a reliance on external verification with heavy penalties for quality and credibility.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline