The submission references a legitimate institution (Hochschule Mannheim) but fails to define a specific technology project. The claims regarding audience reach ('everyone') and traction ('most people have used my product') are verifiably false and exaggerated. The submission lacks technical detail, treating a university description as a software product, resulting in a low score despite the real-world existence of the entity.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline