The submission references a legitimate educational institution (CELSA Paris-Sorbonne) but lacks the characteristics of a technology project evaluation. The input data contains hyperbolic and demonstrably false claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product', 'audience reach: everyone'). While the institution is reputable, the submission itself is low-quality, appearing to be a student test or placeholder entry with no verified technological innovation or relevant traction metrics.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline