The project 'Celo' is a well-established, high-utility Layer-1 blockchain with significant global reach and technical merit, aligning with a 'Unicorn/Large Scale' calibration (400-700+). However, the specific submission provided by 'BlazeForge' is of extremely low quality, featuring hyperbolic claims ('most people have used my product'), missing critical data (revenue, team size), and generic descriptions. Consequently, while the score reflects the project's high intrinsic value and verifiable existence, it is heavily penalized by low Quality Factors and Response Quality scores due to the lack of verifiable evidence in the application itself.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline