The project submission suffers significantly from exaggerated and unverifiable claims. While the mention of winning a 2020 Universidad de Lima startup contest adds a shred of credibility, the statement that 'most people have used my product' is factually impossible and undermines the submission's integrity. Technical details are absent, the launch date (1986) contradicts the startup status, and the 'everyone' audience definition lacks strategic focus. The score reflects a local student project with minimal digital footprint or verifiable traction.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline