The submission describes 'Carina Initiatives', a legitimate and well-capitalized ($31M+ assets) philanthropic foundation addressing math talent inequity. However, the submission quality is critically flawed, listing the project name as 'SwiftForge' and making demonstrably false traction claims ('most people have used my product'). While the underlying organization has high real-world utility and verifiable financial traction, the lack of technical innovation (pure philanthropy) and the incoherent input data severely reduce the Proof of Usefulness score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline