The submission describes a boutique healthcare management consultancy rather than a scalable technology project. While the service likely provides value to its specific clients, the submission suffers from hyperbolic claims (Reach: 'everyone', Traction: 'most people have used my product') that severely impact credibility. There is no evidence of a technology stack or software product. The revenue cited ($500k lifetime since 2015) indicates a stable small business or freelance practice, but the project lacks the technical innovation, scalability, and verifiable metrics required for a higher Proof of Usefulness score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline