The project appears to be a B2B IoT agency ('Carbon Silica') claiming 10 years of experience, but the submission is heavily penalized for hyperbolic, unverifiable claims (e.g., audience reach 'everyone', traction 'most people have used my product'). The 'marketcap' figure is ambiguous and unsupported. Lacking specific case studies, verifiable user metrics, or technical details, the project scores in the lowest tier reflecting minimal verifiable traction and poor submission quality.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline