Carbon Health is a well-established 'unicorn' in the healthcare space with significant real-world utility and verified large-scale operations. However, the submission itself is of very low quality (submitted by 'ShadowShade', incorrect tags like 'climatetech', and hyperbolic claims like 'most people have used my product'). While the underlying project is a verified market leader (valuation ~$3B), the score is heavily penalized by the lack of specific evidence and professionalism in the submission entry. The project fits the 'Much larger scale' calibration bucket but sits at the lower end due to the Quality Factors applied.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline