The submission represents 'Business Insider', a major global media brand, indicated by the domain 'businessinsider.com' and the launch date (2007). However, the submission quality is extremely poor, featuring inconsistent identifiers (Project Name 'StarShade' vs 'Business Insider'), nonsensical financial data ('17000000 marketcap'), and vague claims ('everyone', 'most people'). While the entity itself possesses massive real-world reach and traction (meriting high base scores), the specific submission fails to provide verifiable evidence, triggering a strict 0.5x Quality Factor penalty across most categories. The final score acknowledges the undeniable scale of the platform while penalizing the low-effort entry.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline