The submission describes a legitimate law firm (Bureau 28a) but fails to present a technology project suitable for this evaluation framework. Critical input fields contain nonsensical or demonstrably false claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product', 'everyone' audience). There is no evidence of technical innovation, software, or digital product utility. While the firm appears to be a reputable service provider in Azerbaijan, the submission scores near zero as a technology proof-of-concept due to lack of tech components and low-quality data.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline