The submission describes a small, localized digital agency ('Browse Creative') with generic service offerings rather than a scalable technology product. The input data suffers from extremely low quality, characterized by vague technical descriptions (e.g., 'Internet') and hyperbolic, unverifiable claims of traction ('most people have used my product'). The stated revenue metric ('marketcap: 500000') is misused and, if interpreted as lifetime revenue since 2005, indicates minimal financial scale (£25k/year average). The project lacks the evidence of innovation, reach, or utility required for a higher score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline