The project appears to be a generic IT consultancy focusing on Microsoft Dynamics and AI, but the submission contains critical credibility issues. The claim that 'most people have used my product' is objectively false for a six-person team with no visible web presence. The financial metric is mislabeled as 'marketcap' rather than revenue, indicating potential inaccuracy. There is no verifiable evidence of traction, innovation, or reach, resulting in a negligible score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline