The project appears to be a standard service-based consulting firm rather than a technology product. The submission contains significant red flags, including demonstrably false claims regarding audience reach ('everyone') and traction ('most people have used my product'). There is no evidence of technical innovation or valid software components. The 'marketcap' metric is ambiguous and likely misused. Consequently, the score reflects a lack of verifiable utility as a technology project and poor submission integrity.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline