The project represents a legitimate, long-standing executive search agency (Braines Executive Search GmbH, est. 1990) rather than a technology product. The submission suffers from significant quality issues, including exaggerated audience claims ('everyone', 'most people') and discrepancies in team size (claimed 30 vs. verified ~6). While the business has verifiable longevity in the IoT/Digitalization recruitment niche, the lack of technical innovation and the poor quality of the submission data result in a low PoU score consistent with a non-tech service entry.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline