The submission for Brain_ing describes a generic digital consulting firm but suffers critically from a lack of verifiable evidence and hyperbolic claims. The statement 'most people have used my product' is factually incorrect for a 6-person firm with no visible digital footprint, severely damaging the credibility of the traction metrics. The domain 'braining.com.br' does not appear in standard search indices, suggesting minimal to no actual market presence. While the business model (consulting) has theoretical utility, the submission provides no specific technical implementation, case studies, or realistic audience data to support a higher score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline