The submission represents an active digital marketing agency (Blurn) but suffers from significant data quality issues, including a mismatched project name ('BlazeWing') and hyperbolic claims ('most people have used my product'). While the agency appears to be a legitimate service business with some client testimonials, the 'marketcap' metric is confusing ($500k), and the claimed team size (125) contradicts the implied revenue scale unless heavily outsourced. The project lacks technical differentiation (standard agency model) and the submission's evidence of traction is weak and unverifiable.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline