BlueCrest is a verified industrial giant (formerly Pitney Bowes DMT) with estimated revenues of ~$300M+ and 1,600+ employees, providing critical global postal and parcel automation infrastructure. However, the project submission itself is extremely poor ('everyone', 'most people'), lacking specific metrics or effort. The final score reflects the massive verifiable real-world utility and scale of the entity, significantly penalized by the low quality of the submission evidence (Qi). Scores are scaled to a 1,000-point basis consistent with the 'Comparable Scale' calibration tier, rather than the 'Much Larger Scale' tier it would achieve with proper documentation.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline