The submission represents a digital marketing agency (Blokpoint) rather than a technology product. While the website exists and appears professional, the submission data contains significant errors and hallucinatory claims (e.g., claiming 'most people have used my product' and listing the submitter name as 'IronRider', a likely copy-paste error). The revenue metric ('all time marketcap: 50000') is confusing for a service business and suggests very low traction relative to the claimed team size of 30. The project scores low due to a lack of technological innovation, nonsensical traction evidence, and poor data quality.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline