The submission for BlockchainX presents significant red flags regarding credibility and data quality. While BlockchainX appears to be an operating development agency based in India, the submission data provided is hyperbolic and unverifiable (e.g., claiming 'most people have used my product' and audience reach of 'everyone'). The lack of specific revenue metrics, valid email contact, or concrete case studies results in a heavily penalized score. The submission fails to demonstrate the 'Proof' required for a higher rating, falling into the category of unverifiable traction/low-quality response.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline