The submission for 'Blockbase' contains significant contradictions and red flags. While the URL blockbase.xyz points to an active design agency or small web3 product shop, the submission describes it as 'Blockchain Infrastructure' and 'Venture Capital', which creates a confusion of identity. Crucially, the traction claim 'most people have used my product' is demonstrably false and indicative of a low-effort or spam submission. The input lacks concrete metrics (revenue, team size, active users), and the 'everyone' audience claim is unrealistic. The project scores in the minimal/red-flag range due to these data quality issues.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline