The submission contains critical red flags, including a blatantly false traction claim ('most people have used my product') and invalid contact information. While the concept of a Chilean crypto robo-advisor describes a valid business model, the lack of verifiable digital footprint, the improbable launch date of 2014 (given the lack of history), and the unprofessional quality of the response result in a near-zero score. The project appears to be either a placeholder or a low-effort submission without proven utility.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline