The submission for Blinkly contains severe credibility issues. The claim that 'most people have used my product' is demonstrably false for a two-person team with no discernible digital footprint or revenue. While the concept of quantum-resistant email is relevant, the lack of verifiable technical details and the misuse of 'quantum-computing' as a technology stack (rather than Post-Quantum Cryptography algorithms) suggests a lack of technical maturity or vaporware. Search results yield no evidence of the product's existence or user base, placing this in the lowest tier of evaluation.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline