The project appears to be a local IT services firm with a generic description and no verifiable web presence (domain not indexed). The submission contains significant red flags, including hyperbolic claims of traction ('most people have used my product') and audience reach ('everyone') that are factually impossible for a small regional business. Financial metrics are confused ('all time marketcap'), and the lack of specific technical details or evidence of adoption results in a minimal score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline