The submission for 'Biomeb' suffers from critically low data quality and verifiable falsehoods. While Biomeb appears to be a real niche metabolomics entity, the submission claims 'everyone' as the audience and states 'most people have used my product,' which is objectively false and damaging to credibility. With 'null' revenue and generic 'web-development' tags for a biotech firm, the project fails to provide any evidence of traction, innovation, or utility in this context. The score reflects the likely existence of the business heavily penalized by the 'spam-like' quality of the input.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline