The project presents itself as an MEP and Scan-to-BIM consultancy but lacks verifiable digital presence. The submission is heavily penalized for contradictory and hyperbolic claims (e.g., stating 'most people have used my product' for a niche B2B service) and vague financial metrics ('marketcap: 500000'). While the core service description is coherent, the lack of evidence and unprofessional metadata result in a low score typical of early-stage or unverified concepts.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline