The submission receives a very low score due to critical lack of evidence and hyperbolic claims. The assertion that 'most people have used my product' is non-credible without supporting data. While the reported team size (30) and capitalization ($2.5M) suggest a potential legitimate business, the refusal to provide specific technical details, the empty business type field, and the vague audience definition ('everyone') severely degrade the Proof of Usefulness. The submission fails to demonstrate the claimed scale or utility.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline