The submission for 'Being Zero' suffers critically from hyperbolic and unverifiable claims, such as 'most people have used my product' and an audience reach of 'everyone.' While the project appears to be a legitimate, likely regional (India-based) coding education platform active since 2014, the lack of concrete data (revenue, team size, active users) and the nonsensical response regarding market cap severely penalize the score. The project falls into the 'Minimal Traction' category due to the absence of credible evidence provided in the submission.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline