The project appears to be a small B2B consultancy or early-stage R&D firm focused on smart grid electronics. There is a significant disconnect between the claim that 'most people have used my product' (likely referring to the founder's past employment history) and the project's own metrics ($500k lifetime value over 6 years, which is extremely low for a 6-person team). The submission creates confusion with the name 'StarHeart' versus 'Basegenic' and lacks verifiable evidence of current market traction.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline