The submission for 'Back:us' presents significant contradictions and unsubstantiated claims. While describing a regional B2B consultancy ('Southwest'), the project claims a team size of 125 (contradicted by first-person singular descriptions), an audience of 'everyone', and that 'most people have used my product'—a statement that is objectively false. The metric 'all time marketcap' is misapplied to a service agency. Lacking verifiable evidence of traction or technology, and containing red flags indicative of a low-quality or spam submission, the project scores near zero.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline