The submission presents critical contradictions that severely undermine credibility. While the description refers to a boutique consultancy of three engineers ('Auxo Software'), the metadata claims a team size of 125, 'marketcap' revenue, and universal traction ('most people have used my product'). These discrepancies suggest either a fraudulent submission, an identity mix-up with a larger entity (e.g., Crimsonwing/KPMG), or spam. The project lacks verifiable evidence of the claimed scale.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline