The project 'Audible' is a verifiably massive, market-leading platform with exceptional real-world utility and reach. However, the submission quality is extremely poor, featuring vague claims ('Computer Software'), lazy evidence ('most people have used my product'), and outdated financial data (referencing the 2008 acquisition price). While the entity's verifiable status secures a high baseline score (fitting the 'Much larger scale' calibration >400), the lack of detail in the submission heavily penalizes the Innovation and Response Quality metrics, keeping the score at the lower end of the enterprise bracket.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline